Supreme Court allows EPA emissions rule to stand while litigation continues
The Supreme Court on Wednesday left in place a rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency in May to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide by power plants. In a brief order, the justices turned down a request from states,
WNEM Saginaw on MSN32m
Court Filing: EPA claims it’s not responsible for Flint Water CrisisThe motion states the EPA was not involved in the City of Flint‘s and MDEQ’s decision to switch to the Flint River and forego ...
Analysts say that if the rule is implemented, more than 5 million people could experience blackouts, some lasting for 41 ...
The environmental fight that played out inside the Supreme Court on Wednesday was unusual in many ways: It featured poop, a ...
In a new proposed rule, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) proposes adding 16 individual per- and polyfluoroalkyl ...
The U.S. Supreme Court appeared receptive to upholding the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's right to place generic ...
A motion has been filed in federal court asking for the EPA to not be held responsible for the Flint Water Crisis.
EPA announced a manufacturer of hydraulic equipment and other industrial products, has paid a $366,000 penalty for violations ...
The Science Advisory Board recommended steps geared toward ensuring a more robust framework to combat pollution's ...
Liberal Supreme Court justices on Wednesday strongly criticized San Francisco‘s challenge to the U.S. Environmental ...
Results that may be inaccessible to you are currently showing.
Hide inaccessible results
Feedback